By bunintheoven - 23/10/2012 04:21 - United States - Seligman
Same thing different taste
By depressedpreggo - 18/11/2012 11:00 - United States - Las Vegas
By Anonymous - 27/08/2019 12:00
Presumption
By fmlgrl - 30/07/2012 06:59 - United States - Los Angeles
No warning
By daddy-to-be - 20/03/2009 21:04 - United States
People of Walmart
By Anonymous - 21/01/2015 14:34 - United States
By Anonymous - 31/12/2011 06:21 - United States
Checked out
By Anonymous - 27/09/2019 12:00 - Canada
Delusional
By fmlifetime - 24/10/2009 22:24 - United States
By wtf is wrong with my country - 08/05/2012 17:57 - United States
By Ann - 18/06/2009 19:40 - United States
Top comments
Comments
I agree the cashier was out of line. Congrats on the baby! But remember chocolate isn't the greatest thing for the baby, fruit is fabulous!
Honey, she works at Walmart, of course she's a judgmental bitch. She works in retail hell, for the biggest conglomerate, known for hiring the dregs of society and treating them poorly.
People with no respect for others shouldn't be allowed a job where they face customers..
You got rude service at Walmart! FML.
Being pregnant doesn't suddenly mean you're allowed to eat TWO chocolate bars as a 'snack'. Fat content aside, there is nothing healthy about doing that. Have one chocolate bar and some fruit, for the love of god woman, have some self respect.
As long as you're healthy, weightwise and other, you are allowed to eat whatever the hell you want, especially if you're pregnant.
When the majority of people buy groceries, they often stock up for the next 1-2 weeks. No one said she'd be eating both candy bars back to back. Frankly, for normal and otherwise healthy people it's no big deal to eat two candy bars in one sitting anyhow, once in a while. So long as treating oneself with food isn't a habit, I find it more disrespectful to oneself to be deprived of yumminess due to societies' asinine opinions :)
Chocolate makes women happy it could make the fetus happy :)
Actually, the wording makes it perfectly clear this was for one event 'for a snack' not 'as snacks', whilst the very fact she said 'snack' not 'treat' or some other variation suggests that this is not a particularly rare event. A candy bar is NEVER a snack, and i'm sick of fatass people complaining they're fat whilst using lines like 'oh, it's just a little snack'. Meanwhile, using pregnancy as an excuse just means you'll either get excessively fat over the nine months and struggle to lose the weight, or you'll get so used to eating that much shit that you'll get fat after the baby is born. There is nothing wrong with treating yourself but 'grabbing a couple of candy bars for a snack' does not sound like a rare occurrence, it sounds like 'fatty fatty boom boom'
If I were pregnant I would have raised all sorts of hell, just because it's Walmart.
Being pregnant does not dramatically alter your need for calories. Nor does it justify "eating for two" or living of crap. You need more nutrient, which chocolate will not provide. What you eat during pregnancy deeply effects the child your carrying, for example, the child of a mother who gains excessive weight during pregnancy has a higher risk of childhood obesity. The cashier was bitchy, yes, but if you believe two chocolate bars is a fitting snack, you need a wake-up-call. Even one bar is far to much calories for a snack, and utterly useless from a nutritious point of view. Chocolate is a dessert, not a snack.
How about the fact that the cashier had no idea this was a snack. OP never said she told the cashier 'oh ill Just grab these snickers as a light snack...' The chocolate bars could have been one for her one for her husband, hell they could have been for ANYBODY. So a cashier making snarky remarks is totally unacceptable.
How about the fact that more nutrients means you would need to consume more calories. And I'm sure you don't understand pregnancy cravings. Or anything for that matter judging by your grammar
Chocolate can be a dessert OR a snack. Who are you to lecture a stranger on nutrition? Oh and as someone before me has said: CRAVINGS. You're an idiot.
That is obviously true. And yes, the cashier was bitchy for commenting at all. My comment was however a bit universal regarding pregnancy eating habits, and not only and directly meant for the OP.
You would not need to eat that much more calories to gain nutrients. You only need to eat right. Perhaps I don't understand cravings seeing as I was raised with some self control, and I am intelligent enough to see that "I crave this" is not an acceptable excuse to live of crap. Yes, a person might very well eat a bit of what they crave, but the fact that two chocolate bars a day is an unhealthy habit still stands. Also, attacking ones grammar is generally the last resort one uses when they run out of real arguments. Which you have demonstrates beautifully. And judging my intelligence or knowledge of the world by my grammatical errors is nothing but immature. How many languages do you speak fluently and utterly perfect? English is not my native tongue, so personally I find my skills regarding the language quite satisfying.
You're awfully quick to judge-you don't know whether or not she's overweight, what her regular eating habits are, or even who she was buying them for. I don't know if you're a female or if you've ever been pregnant, but pregnancy cravings are a lot stronger than normal "I'm in the mood for___." No, it's not an excuse to overindulge, but a little chocolate every now and then isn't exactly going to tip the scales. Shame on you for jumping to conclusions.
I hope you told her that; and loudly so that everyone else could hear too. She needs to be taught a lesson. Congrats on the baby btw!
First mistake was shopping at Walmart.
Keywords
Your life doesn't suck. HER life sucks, on account of her being a total bitch.
I don't think that cashier realizes just how close she was to being killed on the spot.