I get it, just trying to quell the feminist "don't use a double standard" jerkbags that seem to troll around here. To answer your question, realistically you are right. Unfortunately in a legal sense, no you are wrong. In order to legally give consent, you must be of sound mind, and stay of sound mind with the ability to withdraw your consent until the actual act of intercourse is initiated. It is the same reason why sex with someone who is unconscious is illegal, even if they say it is okay. They cannot legally give consent for you to have sex with them because once they are unconscious they do not have the ability to withdraw that consent before you start the actual act of sex. On a side note, once actual penetration has occurred, there isn't anything anyone can do or say to make the rest of the act non-consensual. The law actually protects your right to "finish" once the act has been initiated. Apparently even lawyers realize there is a reasonable window where it would be unreasonable to stop.

scary, u know all the details in ur second paragraph. either ur in law or ..... :/

"On a side note, once actual penetration has occurred, there isn't anything anyone can do or say to make the rest of the act non-consensual. The law actually protects your right to "finish" once the act has been initiated. Apparently even lawyers realize there is a reasonable window where it would be unreasonable to stop." Lolwut. Citation severely needed, ************. [Example] A woman could say stop because she no longer wants to continue, maybe she's in a lot of pain for one reason or another. Stop means STOP and no means NO.

Ummm... no? I'm pretty sure that the law goes with the principle that consent can be withdrawn at *any* time. From either side. Seriously, where the hell did you *get* that? Besides, there *is* a double standard. It's mostly come about because of the differing gender roles that people are expected to adhere to in society.