By bridget1989 - 11/03/2016 10:03 - United Kingdom - Swadlincote
Same thing different taste
By dessy - 09/05/2016 21:37 - United States - San Diego
By jshibbz0993 - 23/11/2011 15:16 - United States
By Anonymous - 23/09/2011 17:46 - United States
By LonelyShowers - 04/07/2012 05:36 - United States - Mission Hills
Fire hazard
By Anonymous - 26/09/2020 17:11
Money first
By Anonymus - 31/01/2020 20:00 - Canada - Warkworth
Give me a break
By anon - 18/02/2023 06:00
By me - 02/03/2011 23:21 - United States
Man child, part 2
By Anonymous - 10/11/2020 02:02 - United States
Equality
By Anonymous - 10/07/2023 10:00 - Germany
Top comments
Comments
The two lights, tv and shower on for those hours is probably still cheaper then that pack of bacon.
Lights - probably, although it depends on what kind of lightbulbs they use. TV - depends on how old it is and how much energy it uses. But running a shower for hours is DEFINITELY a lot more expensive than a value pack of bacon. Plus you're pretty much giving Earth the middle finger.
He chose lights and television over bacon. He's not human. Call the MIB
And you're living with this guy because...?
Who actually leaves the showering still running? '-'
I was thinking that exact thing. The lights I can sorta see, because people just don't notice them. The TV, eh, maybe. But the shower? Really?
Is he stupid. Or just plain idiot!? I mean the water running??
Wow. What a moron.
Even putting the money issue aside, that is an incredible waste of resources.
What a massive waste of clean water letting the shower run
Keywords
Wow, I am surprised he would put turning off lights before bacon. I mean, come on! BACON!
Money talks, but I guess your boyfriend wants it to say goodbye