You're a stupid, immature little girl if that's what you got out of this vignette. The OP could have been George ******* Carlin (rest his soul), but if he's drinking and driving, it isn't funny. At all.

Yeah, it's so funny that he could have killed someone. Ha ha I'm laughing so hard right now, I think I'll just punch you in the face.

This opinion is unpopular because it's stupid. Fact 1) Alcohol impairs your judgment Fact 2) Alcohol slows your reaction time Fact 3) Alcohol is a depressant Even your ability to judge how drunk you are is impaired! So if you actually think that drinking a little makes you a better driver in any way, then you are an even bigger moron than most others. At least they admit that it's stupid.

When yoyr drunk or buzzed you always think youre careful. Am i right?

Fact 1) Being stupid affects your judgement. Fact 2) Video games increase your reaction time. Fact 3) Being ugly is depressing. Unless you're intelligent, play video games, and are attractive, you should not be allowed to drive. You can say what you like, but I'm sure I'm more intelligent and have better reaction times buzzed than you ever do sober. And I'm sure I'm a lot more attractive too. Why don't you get off your high horse and realize that a little bit of alcohol has less of an effect than what car you drive. Whether you have good breaks / tires is more important than whether you have a slight buzz, but no one goes around yelling at people who don't have new tires.

I realize that I said "video games increase your reaction time", which isn't clear, I should have said "video games speed up your reaction time" or "video games increase your ability to react". Doubt anyone cares, but I care.

lol, I was about to copy your post format, but when I noticed your username I changed my mind. I was going to make my username Pedantic (a username I use on other websites) but it was taken. Your username is not Pedantic, but close enough for me to lose my train of thought. I assume though you didn't choose (almost the same) name for the same reason though, I choose it because I like the compiler option -pedantic. Anyway, what I was going to say was something like: pendatik, the fact that you don't know the difference between a joke and a serious statement means you should just shut the **** up now. You don't know what you're talking about, clearly, and are making ridiculous arguments to support your ridiculous theory. If you're not drunk, you can drive, and people trying to justify their condemnation of others habits without any medical or statistical evidence that buzzed driving is dangerous and kills people are little better than idiots. Ah, what am I saying, they ARE ******* idiots. Yeah, that means you. I'd like to see statistics showing the difference in accident rates between sober drivers, and drivers who are not drunk, but not 100% sober, and were driving with extra diligence. I see people who are drunk get into accidents, and people who are driving too fast or distracted get into accidents, but not people who are buzzed and driving carefully. You claim that there is overwhelming statistical evidence, I'd like you to show me some.

You're comment is too long.

lol, you're stats agree with me... giving numbers like 0.15 and 0.16 are about twice the legal limit... not exactly in the buzzed category that I'm talking about. If you're swerving you're drunk, not buzzed, also showing my point to be true. I think you don't understand what buzzed means, nor how to construct an argument. So thanks for proving me right... if there were stats supporting your argument you would have given them, but you didn't. The stats are on my side, deal with it.

Today, I typed "you're" when I meant "your". FML

NullPointer, seriously? You believe this ******* drivel you are spouting? You really think that it's a good idea to get behind the wheel of a vehicle whilst somewhat intoxicated with an impaired reaction time (be that 30% or 90% of your normal reaction time)? I mean, whilst driving, you don't really want a reaction time that's impaired at all! The only thing you're right about is that some people drive like idiots when sober, and they're dangerous idiots and I don't know how some of them passed their tests. But that doesn't give anyone else any excuse to do the same or to take stupid risks that can be avoided.

umad.jpg.png.gif.avi.jar.txt.mp3.wma.doc.css.rtf.pdf.log.bat.xml.wav.tar.exe.cs More file extensions => more right You people can argue all you want, doesn't change the fact that your statistics are not relevant, nor the fact that your arguments aren't based on reason. All I'm saying is that a person with a slight buzz who is driving carefully is less likely to get into an accident than the average sober person driving the way they normally do. And there is no way you will ever be able to prove otherwise, so I don't see why you even try.

Are you trying to piss us off, or are you THAT stupid NullPointer? Statistics arent relevant? Are you ******* kidding me? It doesn't matter how much cheap booze you pour down your throat, buzzed driving is drunk driving. If you're so damn confident that buzzed drivers won't get in an accident why don't you try it? I'm sure we'll see your dumbass in the morgue.

NullPointer, I'm not sure why I'm bothering since you're clearly too arrogant to believe anything that contradicts your opinion, but a study shows that drivers with a BAC of 0.01 (that's 1/8 the legal limit in the US) increases the severity of accidents by 37%. Good enough? Still no? Fine, then feel free to continue your stupidity. People like you who continue to believe their own theory, despite any supporting evidence, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, don't deserve to argue anything.

Oh, and I like how you claim to be more intelligent, faster (so what?), and more attractive than I, again with no evidence to support it (that seems to be your modus operandi). People who are truly intelligent and beautiful don't go around cleaning that they are. They let their intelligence and beauty speak for themselves.

claiming* Oops. :)

@NullPointer; "umad.jpg.png.gif.avi.jar.txt.mp3.wma.doc.css.rtf.pdf.log.bat.xml.wav.tar.exe.cs More file extensions => more right" What? "You people can argue all you want, doesn't change the fact that your statistics are not relevant, nor the fact that your arguments aren't based on reason." Dude, that's the ******* point of the statistics! "All I'm saying is that a person with a slight buzz who is driving carefully is less likely to get into an accident than the average sober person driving the way they normally do. And there is no way you will ever be able to prove otherwise, so I don't see why you even try." That's because you're either a moron, or a troll, I'm hoping for the latter. When someone has a "slight buzz" they're experiencing that "buzz" because the alcohol has affected them. Whether it be a small amount or a lot, why bother risking it rather than just doing something safer?