By BeforeItWasCool - 30/09/2012 09:30 - United Kingdom
BeforeItWasCool tells us more.
Wow this seems to have been misinterpreted! It was unplanned, I was entirely surprised by it. We hadn't planned on kids- if it had been positive it would have been an accident. I was just quite happy to have such a nice surprise even if it did turn out to be negative. I was quite disappointed it was negative, not because I've been secretly trying to get pregnant, but because I was pleasantly surprised. It just seems my fiancé was a little too enthusiastic about the negative result.
Top comments
Comments
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayEven after marriage, some people aren't ready for children. My parents are the perfect example. Don't generalize all married couples as perfectly ready and capable for kids; I've known unmarried couples who are basically models for the perfect family.
Broken families can happen even when people wait until they are married to have kids. Also, who says a single mother cannot support her child? Or a single father?
BeccaHugs - I must respectfully disagree with pretty much everything you said. Not every married couple works out, and I know a LOT of single parents who so very well. Your generalisation doesn't work at all.
My parents got married before they had me. They believed heavily in the sanctity of marriage and in traditional values. That's why my mother refused to leave when my dad started beating her, and I had no choice but to watch. They didn't divorce when my dad was openly having sex with another woman, and even I (as a 9-year-old) knew about it. There were fights and arguments every day, over the most trivial things. I never saw any evidence of romance between my parents, and every time my mom wanted to get romantic, my dad would get extremely annoyed. They stayed married for 25 years because they considered marriage an unbreakable bond, and thought it created the best environment for me. They're divorced now, and all three of us are much happier because of it.
Because marriage never leads to broken families, right?
I'm sorry, but marriage doesn't automatically mean committment. I get that it means both partners were ready at the time, but the divorce rate is crazy high. So no, marriage doesn't mean that he (or she, let's not be gender bias here) is ready for the long haul. I mean ultimately marriage is an idea and a piece of paper that declares that you're married. The whole "sanctity of marriage" is kind of a load. It should be the sanctity of the relationship if anything, because you shouldn't suddenly change your values and principles regarding your significant other because you tied the knot. They should be there prior *to* your marriage... And with that thought in mind, does a relationship becomes less valued because the couple is not married but have been together for 10+ years? Some couples don't particularly want to get married - does that mean they shouldn't want/have children? I'm engaged, and I'll be honest... I've thought about dispensing with the whole marriage. Not because I don't love my fiance but simply because we don't need a piece of paper to show our committment to each other. That's my opinion, anyways.
50- you are almost right. A child has a better upbringing when both parents are HAPPILY under the same roof an are involved in their lives.
Um, I know A lot of divorced people with kids. Marriage does not guarantee a non-broken family.
Just because the father isn't there (for example) doesn't mean it's automatically a broken family. I am a single mother and I'm happy. I'm successful, my son is 100% happy too and healthy. He has a huge support system as well as my myself, and it's damn sure better than a deadbeat dad. Sometimes shit happens, but when it does, you make the best of it and deal with it. Yes, it can be a negative thing on children however in some cases (or more) it's more positive that way. The only thing forever in life is change.
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayDid you even talk about it? If he tried to give you a high five i assume he wasnt ready
Just be patient, OP! He's not ready for kids yet, but maybe he will be someday :)
Babies are best created when both participating parties agree prior
Keywords


If he's your fiancé for four years, that means he's still not ready to commit. A baby would probably force him to marry you, something he's been avoiding for years.
^Nailed it. From the wording of the FML, it seems like OP wants to get pregnant without her fiancee's consent. And if that's true, what the hell is wrong with you OP?! Just because you have a "strong relationship" doesn't mean he wants kids. Furthermore, if he doesn't want kids and you do, do NOT get married to him. Those irreconcilable differences.