why the hell would you walk home? he couldve followed you into an alley and raped you.

dont dress like a ***** and you wont have a problem

Well, what do you expect responding with "You couldn't afford me?"

Ahahaa.... to all of you that think this is fake- so what if it is? why is it up to you to proclaim it on a comment? and why does it matter if it makes people laugh? and if it didn't make you laugh, move on to one that did. this site is just for fun :)

That sucks, some people really disgust me. I probably would have walked home in the rain too if I were you.

The first guy's remark is straight out of Borat. I call fake.

Whoa, #133. A woman doesn't invite or deserve rape. And a comment certainly doesn't spur it. Otherwise I would ask what those toddlers and elderly women, the people *most* likely to get raped, said to get a rapist's dick hard. Notice how both of these categories of people are the easiest to isolate and least likely to walk away and get help. It's about control and power, not thwarting come-ons. and #119, talk about a logical fallacy. You could sum your assertion up as "things won't get better because they are crappy, and you deal with crappiness because it won't get better." It's circular logic. There are certainly fewer lynchings after they were criminalized and prosecuted and fewer assaults against gay bars after Stonewall. Maybe "human nature", whatever that means, can't change, but dealing with criminal behavior--and this guy touching this girl is at *least* battery, and could be sexual harassment--could go down if it was socially controlled.

@135: Check out #136's comment. Equally sexist. Condemning half of her own species over a couple of jerks. Thanks a lot, bitch.

@144: She wasn't raped. She was grabbed, and then she walked home. As for logical fallacies, try again. I'm merely pointing out that water is wet, and is going to STAY wet, no matter how much you WANT to change it or wish it would be different. So you remember that water is wet and you stay dry by staying out of the water. There's nothing circular about it. As for being criminal, I never said it was RIGHT or LEGAL what those two guys did (especially the second one). If the OP wanted to, she could have had the old guy charged with sexual assault, and I wouldn't blame her for it. If I had been there, I'd have testified on her behalf. They were being assholes, in public, and deserve what they get. BUT... to say that she bears no responsbility for putting herself in that position is the fallacy. If she wants to keep filing charges against dirty old men, then she can keep doing what she's doing. If she wants to not have to deal with that crap any more, maybe she should figure out how to avoid it a little better, perhaps merely by keeping her mouth shut. Also, learn your charges. Battery involves a beating. Sexual harassment is a workplace crime. This would be a case of sexual *assault*. He touched her in a sexual manner without her permission, but he is not in a position of authority over her (sex. harassment), and he never invaded her body (rape). Rape is a whole other topic, and many of these things reverse. Rape is an intolerable crime of power and is one of the few cases in which I support the death penaty. But she wasn't raped. They just gave her a hard time. These are different things, in the same way that "assault" is different from "aggravated assault" which is different from "murder." There are degrees of things. Don't make more out of it than it is.

lmao agreeing with #9, sorry but its true.