Sexual freedom is what brought about beautiful things like AIDS and other various STDs, but you're right, go **** anything that walks. A little self respect and dignity isn't important, pleasure now and getting what you want now, and not thinking about the future or consequences of your actions is more important than anything else in the world. My God, our society is ******.

sex with someone you're attracted to, whether or not you know them, is undignified and a sign of no self-respect? that's nonsense perpetuated by a prudish society ruined by the inherently strict teachings of organized religion, that despite the lessened importance of religion in modern times, remain ingrained in our collective mindsets. after all, many of the greatest ancient civilizations were able to enjoy sex as it were, instead of creating ridiculous hangups to try and instill guilt in others to prevent them from having sex. would you call them undiginifed? and as far as the contraction and spread of STDs, that is quite obviously a primary reason for the existence of protection. if someone chooses to forgo that perfectly viable option for whatever reason, then by all means they deserve what they get because they know the risks. but why then are the people who practice safe sex during a one night stand demonized? if anything they should be applauded for having the common sense to act out of self-preservation when they could easily just throw caution to the wind.

man child.....Marry me? I don't care that you're probably a dude and I'm a straight guy, MARRY ME NOW!

Right, because condoms protect against the bullets of jealous spouses, for instance. It's not a matter of morality, it's a matter of common sense. It's stupid to have sex with people you don't know.

@124 agreed

I doubt that's even remotely likely, also I didn't know we were taking into account that the drunken dude's wife might be completely and utterly insane.

the liability of the situation where one party in a one night stand happens to be entrenched in a relationship lies entirely on the aforementioned party who is engaging in this infidelity, not with the unwitting accomplice. of course the cuckolded wife can still direct her rage to this supposed brazen harlot who boned her husband, but that doesn't make her the party to blame here. and sure, you can say "well, did she even bother asking?" but then go ahead and quiz yourself on this, if this guy's out on the town looking for a one night stand while already being married, is he really going to admit to it if she asks? stop trying to finger the blame on someone whose participation in this infidelity was unknowing. and i'm failing to see why sex with someone you don't know is so stupid, that's an awfully arbitrary stance to take. how is it just common sense? who came up with the idea that it's just common sense, whose standards allow you to dictate what is stupid for other people to do? as much as you say it's not, it sounds like the rantings of some madman who views himself as some sort of moral paragon in comparison to all the other lost souls wandering the earth who engage only in bizarre, unnecessary decadence. maybe you see it as common sense as opposed to morality, but it absolutely is nothing of the sort.

Did... Did you read the whole thing?