Better late than never
By onehundredpercenteffed - 14/08/2009 01:46 - United States
By onehundredpercenteffed - 14/08/2009 01:46 - United States
By Anonymous - 14/12/2021 01:58
By wallflower - 10/09/2009 06:25 - United States
By Anonymous - 26/07/2022 22:00
By supapimpin - 25/09/2012 15:09 - United States
By Anonymous - 15/06/2014 19:22 - United Kingdom
By Anonymous - 28/12/2022 03:00
By Shooter71 - 16/10/2010 04:09 - France
By Anonymous - 26/10/2018 05:00
By Nickname - 27/08/2018 06:00
By JustMarried - 07/05/2016 21:47 - Ukraine
Yeah, your life sounds terrible! FYL.
To #40 - If you're shaped the right way and the right size to keep hitting G-spots, AND if you've made a concerted effort to make sure the girl has an ******, I'm not surprised that you've managed to make every girl cum without having to bother with anything else. Everyone out there who keeps whining about how only 25% of women can cum just from penetrative sex really need to look at the methods employed in those studies, or, even more importantly, take a look at what the source is of those statistics. Are these women saying that they have never cum from penetrative sex with their partners? If so, then it is NOT that they are physically incapable of having a vaginal ****** (most probably a G-spot ****** if any) but that they merely have never had one during sex with a partner. Look at the abundance of vibrating ****** and the like! These are all meant to simulate penetrative sex and the majority are not designed to specifically stimulate the ********. Are these statistics suggesting that only 25% of the female population can use these successfully? The success of these sorts of sex toys, given the fact that far less than 100% of the female population purchases these things, is HIGHLY suggestive of the fact that the number who can achieve this sort of ****** is far greater than 25% (which is ONE QUARTER of the population and not a small number at all) Try using GoogleScholar for a change and look at an actual RECENT academic article. Don't just rely on that silly "The Myth of the Vaginal ******" from 1968 or studies from more than 40 years ago. SO many statistics quoted here come from studies that were carried out at the beginning of the sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s, and new data is ignored by many girls who like to gripe about how few can have vaginal orgasms. WAKE UP LADIES. Your statistics are outdated and improbable. DON'T USE THESE FIGURES AS AN EXCUSE TO SETTLE FOR UNSATISFYING SEX. Don't complain that you just can't have an ****** from sex alone. Maybe your partner isn't an appropriate size for you, or maybe you haven't explored positions enough to find one that will help you achieve ******. Either way, stop spreading rumors about the vaginal ****** being a myth.
omg my wife decided to bring her girlfriend over and have a threesome with me! she made a diffrent sound this time when she had an ****** so i came here to bitch about it! dude be happy she didnt bring a guy instead of a girl to have a threesome with you. You little whiney baby! SHE HAD A THREESOME WITH YOU! 1. she brought another GIRL. 2. she WANTED to have a threesome. 3. she atleast HAD an ******. dude you are considered lucky. deal with it. YDI for not being able to enjoy the fact that you had a threesome. and in other terms FYL for not being able to satisfy your wife!
Hahaha, you know what's really funny, I'm probably half your age, and I can make my girlfriend ****** four times in one go... That must be gutting for you.
YDI completely for bringing another person into your marital bed, that's just sick.
Keywords
OMG! A girl is better at giving another girl an ******?!?!?! ALERT THE PRESSES!!!!!!!!
You're seriously whinging about getting a threesome?