By Anonymous - 27/11/2010 05:57 - Australia

By Anonymous - 27/11/2010 05:57 - Australia
By nicole - 22/09/2011 10:31 - Reserved
By Anonymous - 23/08/2013 23:30 - United States
By bathtime - 21/12/2011 04:32 - United States
By umm... - 30/03/2020 23:00 - Australia - Canberra
By Anonymous - 21/04/2018 05:00
By Heyy - 24/11/2010 17:55 - United States
By kdmoney - 23/09/2011 06:16 - United States
By crazygirl - 29/10/2009 06:42 - United States
By ToysforHire - 22/09/2018 03:00
By Anonymous - 15/04/2014 16:37 - United States - Erie
Better hope it's water proof.
The men who are responding that it is silly to put money on a vibe don't understand that women are, at times, single and she may have had the object before they met. There are women who are also highly sexed and most men cannot get it up 50 plus times a day so a vibe should be welcomed instead of submerged. So either allow a girl a vibrator or allow her multiple partners to satisfy. If you want monogamy in a relationship don't destroy or comment negatively on the vibe. (I'd agree with you about being silly at spending money on shoes or purses or most 'girl' things, but leave the vibrator bashing talk at the door and just realise the female ****** is more illusive but ever so satisfying when achieved)
you are very passionate about sticking mechanical pleasure sticks up your who-ha. you are A. a weirdo B. seem a bit obsessed with a womans right to posess a vibrator. C. refer to such as a "vibe" WAY too much. D. probably a cat lover too you crazy bi*tch. btw vibrators are awesome
Jeez. Why must there be SO much negativity on this website!!?? You're obviosly not a woman, so you don't even have the right to critisize that comment! unless of course it was approachable or attainable. Clearly it was not!
I agree that there is nothing wrong with them. Guys have their hand, women have vibrators. It's really that simple.
make me a sandwich
the "vibe" thing was kinda weird I have to say
28 made me LOL They're right, y'know
everyone has been referring to it as vibe. she was reaching the entire audience :p
I can understand that he might think you're using it because he's not doing it for you, but destroying it was a bit far, he should have talked to you first. However, OP, you should have reassured him that it wasn't because he wasn't doing it for you, unless he wasn't, in which case you should've told him that in a nice way and taught him how to please you instead.
stfu ^ you generalizing shit.
I thought that the 'he's a guy' thing was a joke... Or was that not the generalisation?
$80 and it wasn't waterproof? Wow. Mine's waterproof and it was only $25. And really guys, what's so threatening about a vibrator? It's not like it's something to replace you.
Mine was only $15 and I think even that was waterproof. Never actually tried it out, though. :P Is a $80 vibrator really any better than a cheaper one? (Well, not in the waterproof-department at any rate, we've already established that much...)
I would've assumed they were all made to get wet.
$80 for a vibrator? Yeah. That means it's good quality, has none of that cheap material that most ****** and vibrators use and there's a good chance it will last longer than a $15 one.
Mr. Rabbit, Mr. Rabbit, your ears are long. Yes indeed, I put them of wrong. Every time I think about the Rabbit vibrator I get that childhood song in my head.(: I'm guessing that's what the OP had. Those thing cost around $80.
How would making it looser help? Oh, and why would Karma make the sex any better? Is that where life ***** you over?
hahaha kudos
what a fag
Keywords
I really wish people would get a clue and stop comparing sex to vibrators. They're two completely different things that give different form of stimulation. Toys are not replacements for actual sex.
Headline - "Jealous lover tries to drown competition after getting bad vibe."