Sex may not be important to you if you're not married, but to some people it can make or break a relationship. In this case, she may be being selfish, but you also don't know why she's acting that way. Maybe her boyfriend's been away for a while and this is the first chance she's got. Maybe she's even got kids and they're out of the house for once. You never know. So, grow up and be an adult; stop assuming.

OP's not really helping herself out by not clarifying. If she had said, "My kids are at their grandparents for the day, leaving us alone for the first time in months and he wants to find easter eggs instead of have sex, FML." Well... I'd still tell her to lighten up, and you can have sex at night when the kids go to bed. XD Or after you find the eggs. But at least her annoyance might be a little more understandable.

Make it or break it? The reason most relationships don't work out is because of sex. If people waited nowadays to have sex for when they're married, they wouldn't not only judge a relationship on sex, but you'd love the person for who they are, not for how they are in bed. And yeah it is important to me. I'm married with kids. My wife had sex before she married me, and all those relationships didn't work out. Sure, I've seen relationships work out in the end even when they had sex before marriage, my friend is that way. But if she is complaining about her boyfriend wanting to go egg hunting before sex, she shouldn't take it personally, it's just an egg hunt... and yeah, she wasn't clarifying, so therefore #51, you don't know either. Besides, I'm already an adult, I use my brain. - - and who's assuming? I assumed nothing. I don't know how you got that out of my comment. Overall, that's my opinion, and I'm entitled to it. Try actually taking what I meant into a deep thought... you'll figure it out.

65 - There's no need to be a condescending douche when I was merely pointing out an alternate point of view. I'm sorry you're so seemingly offended by that. Anyway, I'd disagree with where you said "most relationships don't work out ... because of sex." That's not true at all! Any of my past relationships (and the same goes for my friends - it's not just my situation I'm talking about here) have ended because of a) conflicting personalities, first and foremost, and b) changes in personalities. None of my past relationships have ended because the sex was bad, although I don't doubt there are relationships out there which have ended for that reason. I do love the man I'm with for who he is; sex helps me build that special connection with him, but it's not all I depend on. The amount of time you're with a person is usually what tells you what they're like overall, not the sex. So really, it doesn't matter if a person has sex with the person for the first time before or after marriage because it's the personality that matters more, at least in my opinion. You're entitled to yours. Then again, just because (I assume from how your comment was worded) you waited to have sex for the first time until after marriage doesn't mean how your relationship turned out will be exactly how everyone else's turns out. I'm happy for the fact you're happy with your wife and all, but maybe her past relationships failed because the other guys were assholes or simply weren't compatible. If you've seen relationships work out even after having had sex before marriage, don't act like it never happens. It happens more often than you think. For some reason you seem to be under the impression those relationships you mentioned (i.e. your friend's) are a fluke and the norm would be seeing those kinds of relationships fail. Not true. I didn't say I "knew" why OP was complaining. I'm not assuming anything about her case either; like I said I was pointing out alternate POVs. Unfortunately your lack of reading led you to the conclusion I know everything. Sure, I wish that were the case, but I don't. Next time, accept someone else's comments on your posts as other possibilities instead of the gospel.

Whoa, there! Calm down, sweetie. He was merely stating his opinion and he did it in a respectful way, in no way was he acting like a 'condescending douche'. We all have our opinions and if someone disagrees with yours, especially on the internet, you don't have to take so much offense and write them an essay about it. It doesn't make them a bad person for not believing what you believe. Okay? So just take a breeaather :)

106 - "Try actually taking what I meant into a deep thought... you'll figure it out." This implies a better-than-thou attitude, and it was what I was referring to.

"So, grow up and be an adult; stop assuming." "There's no need to be a condescending douche" Hypocrite much?

omg..why are the comments up there sooooo long!??

114 - Let's get this straight. I told him to stop assuming with that phrasing because I was mocking him, hence the similarity in the phrasing of our posts. As for the last paragraph in my long post (sorry about the length, guys... didn't think it would turn out that long) I was also mocking him. I wasn't a condescending douche at all. Please come back when you've looked up what it means and then looked at each of our posts.

You are mocking him AND you aren't a condescending douche? Does not compute.

I'm mocking him, yes. That doesn't make me condescending. I didn't call him names, hurt his feelings, etc etc etc.

It's hilarious when people argue over FMLs, etc. Hah.