By Anonymous - 07/04/2009 16:36 - United States
Same thing different taste
By crosseyed - 10/06/2009 19:42 - United Kingdom
By Salvation711 - 15/04/2012 15:29 - United States
By :)) - 22/04/2010 17:37 - Greece
Why so serious?
By wow - 09/08/2011 04:01 - United States
News to me
By Jean Chretien Lookalike - 23/04/2021 02:04
By Anonymous - 08/10/2013 21:16 - United States - West Chicago
By Anonymous - 19/04/2009 18:42 - United States
By Black Cat 13 - 04/09/2010 06:52 - United States
By greattt - 10/02/2009 21:15 - United States
By sarah - 18/04/2009 20:46 - United States
Top comments
Comments
#s 12 and 61 made me literally lol. =)
haha I am with #62. That lady is obviously an idiot. It was not your fault.
#60 is spot on, this is what I was going to say... Totally the mom's fault.
People need to stop saying that it's the OP's fault. How in GOD'S name is (s)he supposed to know that the little girl was naturally cross eyed? Mom shouldn't assume that the world knows her daughter has ocular problems.
I am so with #4. Does that make me a bad person? Mother's fault.
how would you know? if the mom and the kid left.. how would you ever find out the kid was naturally cross-eyed??
Good point. It does seem fishy. Sounds like the mother told /someone/ working there just not the OP and thus somewhere communication had broken down. Regardless, she overreacted.
Yeah, mom here is a little misguided in how she protects her kid. It's understandable she didn't think to mention it at the beginning, but she could and should have discreetly mentioned something to you the first time you commented on it. I'm sure you would have apologized and gone on with the shoot.
How did you not notice she was cross-eyed idiot. Obviously your powers of observation failed you.
damn. the mom should've told you.
Keywords
The mom could've explained..
well its not really your fault, the mom didnt tell you, who isnt gonna naturally assume that a little kid is making faces when they cross their eyes?