By Anonymous - 17/05/2014 19:33 - United States - Fresno
Same thing different taste
By Anonymous - 04/05/2016 14:15 - United Kingdom - Saint Austell
By wdunn69733 - 11/10/2012 14:30 - United States - Macon
By - - 09/11/2010 00:38 - United States
By GMD - 18/09/2012 20:20 - United Kingdom - Belfast
By WtfDoIDo?! - 02/07/2019 04:00
By Username - 12/05/2011 11:09
By ohcrap - 11/12/2009 00:28 - United States
By Anonymous - 22/09/2015 21:54 - United Kingdom - Cardiff
Adulting
By FailedMommy - 24/02/2024 03:00 - United States
Today, on "Dr. Phil"…
By Anonymous - 06/08/2020 02:01
Top comments
Comments
Who cares? They're not related by blood.
They're also very developmentally in different stages
Not that different girls are ussually a couple years ahead of guys that why marriages where the guys is 5 years old have a higher success rate
five years oldER*
I can hear the audience now, "Jerrrry Jerrrry Jerrrrry! "
yup sounds like sumthing that would be on there bro lol
That's rather odd. Guys that age normally go for older girls that aren't in the family. Best of luck with that situation.
Was that really necessary...
I agree with #13. Who said they can't go out? Society and marriage contract, that's who.
Maybe because 1 they'll be living in the same house I which they can do a lot more 2 if they break up it will be awkward 3 are you missing point that they will soon be brother and sister?! They're parents are getting married 4 she's friggen 12 and he's 15. At 12 I didn't know what sex was now I'm 15 and Ik every thing there is to know Trust me he's most likely only only thinking about sex too I just gave you many reason they can't date. Take ur pick
"Step" barely makes any difference. Sure, they're not sharing the same genes, but they're still by law, brother and sister. The boy is 15, and he's most likely curious and interested in sex. The girl is not even halfway developed - physically or mentality - to do anything. It's 2014, please don't try to justify their slightly incestuous relationship by saying they're not related.
*mentally
@35 I'm actually not "spreading legs" and never have don't assume I am because it makes you sound dumb... And step sisters and step brothers are still siblings.
Actually, if you're not spreading legs you can't possibly know all there is to know. Logical fallacy.
At 15 they know everything about everything and you can't tell them different when she's about 21 she'll realise how uninformed she accually was
Even if they break up, things will be really awkward and weird. In a way, it could be them trying to get you to not marry your fiancé, OP?
Jail bait
This will be interesting...but either way that's illegal
Actually, it's not illegal. You can marry your step siblings just fine. The only reason you can't marry your real siblings is because incest creates disabled children. Actually, recent research has shown that even first cousins have no more chance at making disabled children than complete strangers do. The only risk is direct siblings.
Actually it's still frikkin gross. **** science.
Actually, close cousins can still carry a risk, but the chance of reinforcing bad genes is not the only issue in incest, which is why most jurisdictions include step relatives and inlaws in the legal definition.
1 generation of 1st cousins has been shown to not increase risk beyond that it does
you're an idiot that's not illegal in anyway they're both underage and neither are blood related so think before you speak
Underage sex is perfectly legal As long as all partipants are underage
Maybe he just doesn't want you to marry her dad
Keywords
Oh wow that's not going to work out
That's one way of keeping it in the family