And it's a choice of course :p I chose to be straight and to find girls attractive to me :p On a serious note, I've been asking myself something... Imagining homosexuality was caused by genes (I heard they play a role at least), and imagining it was somehow possible for a pregnant woman to undergo some kind of treatment to guarantee her kid will be straight and not gay. Would that be considered ethical? Would gay right defenders claim we should let nature choose? Would some lesbian women have treatment to guarantee their kids will be gay, as a sign of protest against the "treatment" that makes kids straight? There is no doubt in my mind that if we could guarantee a child will be born healthy, without any genetic diseases or deformations, people would not protest against this. But I wonder what reactions would be if homosexuality could be avoided in the same way. I do not want to compare homosexuality to a disease or a deformation, I am only attempting to compare the imaginary "treatments" together. I'm just trying to explain that in some circumstances it is considered acceptable to mess with a kid's genes before he is born. Would it be acceptable to do the same to prevent homosexuality? No doubt some people would claim "if we were all gay there would be no more kids, so this treatment is a good thing". But my question actually is: would gay rights groups care that couples chose to make their children straight? I know nobody can really answer that, only theorize and imagine how things would be. But I really am curious about this.