Puppy training
By doggone - 05/05/2012 23:07 - United States - King Of Prussia
By doggone - 05/05/2012 23:07 - United States - King Of Prussia
By Patrick - 14/10/2012 04:39 - United States - Sulphur
By Puppysit88 - 16/04/2009 21:36 - United States
By Anonymous - 13/12/2016 13:27 - United States - Mountain View
By kiwibox - 26/10/2013 01:50 - United Kingdom - Ipswich
By Puppy problems - 27/10/2013 01:23 - United States - Essex Junction
By crybaby - 28/06/2016 17:54 - United States - Seattle
By missmisfit - 13/06/2012 04:14 - Canada - Montreal
By Slaanesh - 12/12/2008 12:08 - France
By Pisser - 26/06/2014 04:57 - United States - Portland
By Anonymous - 26/12/2010 02:29 - United States
Scaring isn't the same as punishing, but you shouldn't punish her anyway. Puppies don't understand things like that.
Dogs learn faster when their young.
Actually, you should show the pup they are doing wrong. Wholw point of training, so they LEARN. It's not like she beat the shit out of it. She took a trainer's advise, which is what she should be doing any how.
^Whole* point
The same thing happens with me. Except with quarters.
Look up crate training. Less frustrating for both of you. Just do it right and not halfassed.
I've heard that its not a good idea to punish your pooch for peeing in the wrong places because apparently they'll associate punishment with the act of peeing instead of where it's peeing
You could counter that by rewarding them when they pee outside, though. Or instead of punishing them when they pee inside, you could pick them up when they do it and put them outside for a little while.
The trainer is a ******* moron. You don't do something like that, especially to new animals who are just learning to trust you. You respond with a stren "no" and then take them outside and wait there until they pee outside, which you then give them a treat with a lot of praises. Next time you buy a new animal look up ways how to take care and train them before you decide to buy. This is coming from someone who trains dogs as a hobby, and my newest dog was one who was abused by her previous owners, causing her to take a piss on teh floor if you raise your voice, even if it's not directed at her.
It's a ****** dog u jackass I LOVE dogs but if the puppy pisses on the floor u do the same thing ppl have been doing for ******* years u point at and sternly tell it no its not like OP is ******* kicking the dog in the face just stop being such a ******* bitch we should treat animals with respect and love but they are just ******* animals and it pisses me off so much when people are like "oh don't spank your dog when he pees it poops inside just tell him no" it's the same thing with kids sometimes when they do something wrong u have to ******* hit them!
I agree, #26; OP shouldn't have bought a puppy if she hadn't researched it beforehand. I can understand the use of the coin-can being a distraction; but OP is using it incorrectly and far too early. I got a 3yr old rescue dog who had no house training whatsoever, and managed to train her with ease without punishing her once. I guess every dog owner has to start somewhere and I give OP credit for getting a dog trainer; we all make mistakes, it's just a shame the puppy suffered as a consequence.
26. You a a moron for believing in positive only training. Training requires both negatives and positives. 'no' isn't a negative, the dog does not understand the meaning behind it. You may as well have said bananas. It must be disciplined for doing the wrong thing and praised for doing the right. I think you should find another hobby as you fail a a dog trainer.
#138, it isn't the word that the puppy will understand, it's the tone of voice you use when saying said word. A NEW puppy who's still not aware of the rules, stressed with separation anxiety, doesn't need discipline, it simply needs training. If you walked into my house and did something wrong (unknown to you) and I came running up to you blowing an air horn in your ear without saying a single word, you would be terrified and would have learnt nothing. I find it worrying that you would consider instantly using discipline methods on a new puppy. In case you haven't noticed, the discipline method in this FML had a very negative effect.
Oh yeah, and if #26 can train his/her dogs well without any discipline, then he/she is anything BUT a bad trainer.
The discipline had a negative affect as it was done wrong. A young pup doesn't know the rules correct. Also dogs do not use vocal noises as their primary communication. Watch a bitch and her pups, just days old, if they bite her nipple to hard, she disciplines them does she not? And how does she do it? By nipping the back of their neck. She doesnt growl at them and push them away. You don't see the dog cowering from the bitch after this do you? Or ******** themselves. They learn that biting to hard means they get disciplined. Again only a few days old! The dog should be weeks old by the time you get it. Explain to me why you are trying to teach the dog a new way of being corrected? (by yelling no, showing anger/frustration, and 'growling') when for the past 8weeks of its life it already had a way of being corrected, a way it understands at a primal level?
And don't compare the way humans learn. This shows that you have 0 knowledge of the way a dog see's things.
When puppies are first born they cannot hear which is why after a while the mum learns to nip them gently as growling gets no reaction
Then did you shake the can again
I've never heard of that method but I don't like the sound of it, you could traumatise the poor thing. If a dog misbehaves, slap it on the nose. Not softly but not hard enough to really hurt it either. Just enough that it will want to avoid you doing it again. It's vital though, to reward them when they are well behaved or do what they're told. It's also important to punish them the minute they misbehave.
If I slapped my rescue dog on the nose, it would probably bring up all the unwanted, aggressive behaviour I managed to train out of it. A sharp stern (slightly growly) "No" and a stern look should be enough to stop the dog doing unwanted behaviour, if it's well trained. I agree with your last sentence though.
79 - That's fine, I'm not saying a small hit on the nose is the only way to go or anything like that. But a stern "no" works best with, like you said, a well trained dog. A pup like the OP has wouldn't find the stern "no" as significant as your dog or mine. I haven't had to hit my dog on the nose in years, he's at the point where a sharp "no" is enough. But he got there by being encouraged when he behaved and tapped on the nose when he didn't.
The stern "no" is supposed to work just like the sound of the pennies. OP misused it to scare the dog as a punishment, but it's to distract the puppy from what it's doing, and eventually they catch on to what the word means. It's not just for an already trained dog. And what's the difference between what you are suggesting and scaring the dog with a loud sound? Hitting on the nose is not necessary and I'd say just as damaging.
Just saying, you should never slap a dog on the nose, even lightly. It's a very sensitive area, and you can damage their sense of smell forever (which is a pretty cruel thing to do to a dog). If you feel the need to use corporal punishment on your pet (which isn't actually necessary in training), you give it a light smack on the behind.
Fair enough, I concede that a tap on the nose isn't necessarily the best way to raise a dog. Still, it's not like I'm condoning beating them. A tap on the nose is the way I was taught to make a disobedient dog behave and if my dog's usual behavior is anything to go by, it worked.
Oh, I won't deny that it works, it works very well. But it's also permamently damaging. However, if you didn't know then you didn't know. Like I said, I'm just saying. It's not the best way to discipline a dog.
shoulda just given it a swift swat on the butt lol.
It? The puppy isn't a candy bar. HER.
Keywords
It seems you've literately scared the shit out of your dog
Isn't that what Lois does to Brian?