Up your game
By Anonymous - 06/05/2009 15:07 - United States

By Anonymous - 06/05/2009 15:07 - United States
By Sally - 26/12/2011 11:48 - Australia
By virgo - 30/01/2010 06:50 - France
By sexytime - 02/09/2009 06:33 - United States
By Anonymous - 06/07/2022 22:00
By Anonymous - 15/06/2014 19:22 - United Kingdom
By Shooter71 - 16/10/2010 04:09 - France
By rj - 12/05/2012 14:42 - United States - Goddard
By Simon Edhouse - 13/09/2021 09:00 - New Zealand - Auckland
By Anonymous - 11/06/2024 14:00 - United States - Lynbrook
By AnonymousAmber - 31/10/2014 23:10 - United States - Yadkinville
If the OP is a girl, there's really no excuse for not being able to get laid if you want to. Unless you're ugly. And even then, it's not impossible. If its a guy, well, just keep trying!
Get over it.
the student has surpassed the teacher.
This isn't a case of FML.
So? All this means is that she's a ***** and ur not. This isn't a fml.
I fail to see the problem here. Your friend is a girl, and I'm assuming you're a girl. Are you saying that you've been TRYING to have sex often but fail? Because I would think that, unless you were blindingly I-would-rather-chew-off-my-own-arm-than-have-sex-with-you ugly, you should be able to go out and get laid if you want. If that's what you wanted. Who the hell cares how often your friend has had sex. It's not like you couldn't either. Bottom line: this is not a FML unless you are so unattractive that no one would want to have sex with you, because you could easily change the situation. #9: Slow your roll. #3 said the logical equivalent of "you don't go around having lots of sex, so at least you're not a *****." The contrapositive would be, "if you're a *****, you go around having lots of sex." BUT He/she didn't say "if you go around having lots of sex, you're a *****." If you've taken a class in logic, you'll notice there's a difference, so stop jumping to conclusions.
How do you know that being a ***** does not imply a bi-conditional relationship? Perhaps the inverse mapping function from lot's of sex to ***** holds as easily as the original function of ***** to lots of sex. I would have to see disproof that being a ***** does not form Reflexive Transitive Closure.
I was about to type an essay of a comment, but #30 has basically said everything I wanted to :).
agreed (: #30 said it!
Keywords
i guess you're not in much of a position to give her advice then, huh? unless you used to get it on all the time or something.
Why did you lie? And what makes you a sex guru?